CS 25.2: Alexander Graham Bell

Posted by – 8 February 2010

CLERC SCAR 25.2
8 February 2010

=====
ALEXANDER GRAHAM BELL
Keri Brooks Ogrizovich
Lines: 19
[Poem]

A.G. Bell, a man known worldwide and
Lauded for his invention of the telephone, yet he initiated an act of
Eugenics by sterilizing Deaf people, which makes one wonder if he had
Xenophobia, a fear of Deaf people since
According to the majority we are considered foreign.
Never would one have suspected he was responsible for the
Deed of planting the seed in Hitler’s plans for the most horrific,
Execrable act in history, known to the world as the Holocaust.
Really, how ironic is it that this man went on to have children with his Deaf wife?
Granted, the man was full of ironies; he had no clue that Deaf children are
Reproduced mostly by hearing parents–ninety percent, in fact.
Alas, his acts have not broken our spirits, even when his opinion about Oralism was
Heralded at the Congress of Milano and led to its devastating outcome.
All over the world, Deaf people came together to fight for their language
Mostly through newspapers and word of hand, all before technology existed!
Because Deaf people gathered together as a collective group, they became the
Epitome of the human spirit and prevented the eradication of sign language.
Long live our unique, precious, and visual
Language, the key to the survival of Deaf culture and its people!

=====
Keri Brooks Ogrizovich lives the idyllic hippie-ish lifestyle in Vermont with her husband, two boys, two dogs and a few chickens. She kiss-fists her job as a university professor and works as a Certified Deaf Interpreter on the side.

=====
We welcome letters to the editor in response to this piece. Send to editor@clercscar.com. We reserve the right to edit letters for space and clarity or not to publish a letter.

We are always open to submissions. Submit your writing, artwork, or video to editor@clercscar.com.

To subscribe, email subscribe@clercscar.com with the message “Subscribe daily” or “Subscribe weekly.”

To unsubscribe, email subscribe@clercscar.com with the message “Unsubscribe me.”

Find us on Twitter and Facebook!

Visit our archives or bookstore at http://www.clercscar.com.

Copyright 2010 by Clerc Scar. All rights reserved.

  • Share/Bookmark

CS 25.1: What Were You Thinking, Alex?

Posted by – 8 February 2010

CLERC SCAR 25.1
8 February 2010

=====
WHAT WERE YOU THINKING, ALEX?
Aaron Weir Kelstone
Words: 455
[Essay]

What were you thinking, Alex? Your mother was deaf and you grew up with her your whole life. You saw how the experience of being deaf can be a terrible, isolating one, especially when deaf people try to interact with a hearing world that does not understand in any way or form what it is like to be deaf, its joys and frustrations, the whole shebang. Knowing all that, how could you suggest that deaf people be kept apart from one another and not to socialize, marry, or have a culture?

What were you thinking, Alex? You believed that when deaf people married deaf people, it meant more deaf people are brought into the world. We know better, and if you knew, would you have fallen in love with a deaf woman, married her, knowing your marriage provided a higher probability that a deaf person would be born into your family? Would you have married Mabel Hubbard if you knew what we know today?

What were you thinking, Alex? You taught deaf students yourself. You promoted the idea that speech needed to be a visual experience. Your father invented a process called “Visual Speech.” How did you let the oral movement get away with ignoring the basic concepts you understood through direct experience in the classroom? Why didn’t you care enough to fight the good fight to get it right in the first place?

What were you thinking, Alex? You benefitted in so many ways from the invention of the phone, from your exposure to deaf people, from your use of sign language. You signed so fluently and used it in public to the point you embarrassed Mabel. Your wife asked you to stop signing in public for God’s sake. What were you thinking to discourage the use of sign language?

What were you thinking, Alex? You received so much monetary blessings in life. You knew Edward Miner Gallaudet. You meet deaf people from all over the place, but you never donated a penny to the National Association of the Deaf or accepted their invitation to come talk to us face-to-face in the traditional deaf way. You knew this very well. What were you afraid of, Alex?

So many questions and we still don’t know you very well. You never gave us a chance to get to know you. You never gave yourself a chance to know us. We had so many opportunities to sit down and talk this through. Now you are demonized beyond recognition. There no longer remains any chance to be known, understood, or accepted. We are all down to a Bushism, “Either you are with us or you are against us.” Where do we find the compassion to understand you, Alex?

=====
Aaron Weir Kelstone teaches in the Department of Creative and Cultural Studies at the National Technical Institute for the Deaf.

=====
We welcome letters to the editor in response to this piece. Send to editor@clercscar.com. We reserve the right to edit letters for space and clarity or not to publish a letter.

We are always open to submissions. Submit your writing, artwork, or video to editor@clercscar.com.

To subscribe, email subscribe@clercscar.com with the message “Subscribe daily” or “Subscribe weekly.”

To unsubscribe, email subscribe@clercscar.com with the message “Unsubscribe me.”

Find us on Twitter and Facebook!

Visit our archives or bookstore at http://www.clercscar.com.

Copyright 2010 by Clerc Scar. All rights reserved.

  • Share/Bookmark

CS 24: Contents

Posted by – 5 February 2010

CLERC SCAR 24
1-5 February 2010

CONTENTS

=====
Monday

CHASING VISTAS 23
Melanie Bond
[Memoir]

IN DEAF CULTURE . . .
Matt Daigle
[Comic]

=====
Tuesday

2012 DEAF APOCALYPSE?
Mary J. Thornley
[Essay]

PERSISTENCE OF HEARING EXPECTATIONS
Heather Lightfoot Withrow
[Artwork]

=====
Wednesday

NO CI: A HEARING PERSPECTIVE
Mark Drolsbaugh
[Essay]

INCOMPATIBLE
Nancy Rourke
[Artwork]

=====
Thursday

STOFFEL’S GUIDE TO WORKPLACE NEWSLETTERS
Scott Stoffel
[Humor]

25 CENTS: PART THREE
Aaron Weir Kelstone
[Play]

=====
Friday

FEEDBACK FRIDAY
[Letters to the Editors]

=====
We welcome letters to the editor in response to this piece. Send to editor@clercscar.com. We reserve the right to edit letters for space and clarity or not to publish a letter.

We are always open to submissions. Submit your writing, artwork, or video to editor@clercscar.com.

To subscribe, email subscribe@clercscar.com with the message “Subscribe daily” or “Subscribe weekly.”

To unsubscribe, email subscribe@clercscar.com with the message “Unsubscribe me.”

Find us on Twitter and Facebook!

Visit our archives or bookstore at http://www.clercscar.com.

Copyright 2010 by Clerc Scar. All rights reserved.

  • Share/Bookmark

CS 24: Feedback Friday

Posted by – 5 February 2010

CLERC SCAR 24
5 February 2009

FEEDBACK FRIDAY

=====
Re: “Redefining D-E-A-F” by Ryan Commerson

I deliberately added PhD to my name as I wanted to cite a point supporting Ryan’s comments on be-littling attitude of hearing persons have toward deafness.

I normally do not use nor do I flaunt the fact I was conferred a doctorate of Humane Letters from Gallaudet especially among my deaf friends; however, I have found that when I deal with hearing persons that may have low opinion of me, I would use either “Dr Bosson” or “Ed Bosson, Phd” in various communication mode. Email, writing, filing out forms, thru interpreter, etc. Sad to say invariably, the attitude of hearing persons changes drastically when he or she learned that I have PhD. They would show respect to me and even more than few occasions address me with either “Sir” or “Dr Bosson”. The conversation suddenly takes on a much more meaningful and informative conversation.

The most recent event of that was I had a laser surgery on one of my eye. Nurse was being disrespectful, so I decided to bluntly tell her to please address me as Dr Bosson. Wow, what a change. She alerted Dr of this, and thereafter I was able to get important information regarding the surgery. The whole Dr’s office was respectful and friendly. Sad that I had to resort to that.

Ed Bosson, PhD

=====
Re: “Redefining D-E-A-F” by Ryan Commerson

This is a reaction to Dr. Bosson’s comment.

Yes, I get that experience too. When other people find out that I graduated from a Canadian university (which has an international ranking as one of the world’s top 50 universities), their attitudes toward me changes and they show me more respect.

I want to add that I’ve been told that I don’t look or act deaf. These questions then strike me, “So what LOOKS deaf? What does ACTING deaf look like?” This implies that people believe there is a spectrum of who is more or less deaf. This is something for us, as deaf people, to think about. We need to show people that there is a variation of deaf people just like how there is a variation of hearing people. For example, not everybody (deaf or hearing) can read, dance, play drums, etc.

So leading to the article, we need to reframe ourselves in order to change the ideology of “DEAF” for the hearing world. However (as Terri mentioned), the majoriy of world’s view on Deaf is structured by hearing people. We need to do something about that NOW. This won’t be an easy feat. Change is not going to happen overnight. We may not even see change in our lifetime, but it WILL be good for future generations.

This article is a good way to wake us up and realize what we’re in. It’s time for us to take ACTION! Like Gandhi said, “Be the change you want to see in the world.” and that is exactly what we should be doing.

Jordan Sangalang

=====
Re: “Redefining D-E-A-F” by Ryan Commerson

Reframing in yourself is one thing and a good thing — but the bigger problem is that the entire world view of Deaf people is structured by hearing people who inherently believe that Deaf “can’t”. Deaf learn that the language of choice is English (spoken is even better than writing and reading) and many MANY Deaf BELIEVE this — even to the point of not signing with their hearing children, so they dont disable their children by giving them ASL. Deaf learn that ASL is a “second choice” language for people who cannot learn English, who will not graduate from High School with a “real” diploma. Deaf learn that they will not succeed or compete with their hearing peers — because they cannot — because their interpreters are not able to give them them equivalent experience, much less a competitive edge. Fingerspelling English words is not effective, and does not teach Deaf people English, nor create equal and understandable expereince for Deaf people.

I want to reframe how Interpereters see Deaf people. I want to reframe how interpreters think about how they deliver information to Deaf people. Interpreters are KEY to creating an opportunity for respectful communciation between intelligent Deaf people and hearing people who believe that the Deaf are in some way, incapable of being intelligent. But the interpreter who cannot understand the Deaf person (fast enough — or at all), or is unable to express the language accurately, while sounding confident and being loud enough so that the hearing people know this Deaf person has said something. . . intelligent . . . worth listening to. . .

If the interpreter cannot do this, or if the interpreter is making mistakes unknown to the Deaf person and allowing the conversation to continue, becuase “once we hang up — I dont have to worry about it any more”. . .

The Deaf person can reframe inside themselves all they want but the hearing world will continue to step on them.

Terri Hayes

=====
Re: “Redefining D-E-A-F” by Ryan Commerson

I think RC was a little too conservative. The source I have from a New York State University study shows that 87% of blind people are on welfare and 92% of deaf people on welfare.

Al

=====
Re: “Killing NCSD” by Adrean Clark

Great cartoon! That is how many of the teachers and staff feels for the last 10-12 years. . . suffocating to work with the people in the Office of Education Services (OES). 99 1/2 % of the staff have no deaf education degrees nor have ever worked or taught deaf children before coming to work for the OES. They have had cleverly kept NCSD and ENCSD under the mat for so long that the schools have lost enrollment. The Superintendent has persistently said that it is a natural decline in enrollment, but there are 600 deaf and hard of hearing in the early intervention program plus many more are mainstreamed. The parents are encouraged to keep their children in the public school system. Some parents have not heard of the schools for the deaf. So many times the teachers and the staff wants to do innovative ideas to make the school better but the OES’s motto is “NO!” or “Can’t do that”. Their philosophy is “Try public schools first. If a child fails, then send him/her to schools for the Deaf.” The average age of “failed” students that go to schools for the deaf is between 9 and 12 years old. That is toooo late! Then the state and the OES expects the teachers to be miracle workers! I am amazed that parents have not sued the state, OES, or public schools for waiting too long to find out that the deaf child isn’t succeeding in the system. Is this fair to the deaf/hard of hearing child? It is a sad era that the deaf and hard of hearing children have to go to public schools to be more isolated. . .

Caring for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Kids

=====
Response to Marla Re: “Contortions” by Mary Thornley

Thank you for your remarks.

In the past, I did attempt to contact individuals. Perhaps I got a response. Maybe not.

Whoever I reached might have thought, “Oh well. Just one person’s opinion.” And felt safe ignoring me.

Some years ago, I read an article in a newspaper about a woman who was being charged with child neglect because she ‘left her baby in the care of a deaf mute.’

I called the newspaper and asked to speak to the reporter. I told him many, many deaf people are responsible, caring parents, and he had made their task more difficult by writing what he did.

But–hundreds of thousands of newspapers are published everyday, worldwide, with similar stories and objectionable comments. Addressing each one individually would be like plowing the sea.

Better to get it ‘out there’ in a public format, don’t you think? Others may think twice if they know that someone might give them an unfavorable review.

Mary Thornley

=====
Re: “2012 Deaf Apocalypse?” by Mary Thornley

I touched on this issue briefly in my 5A5A 2045 comic, page 5.
http://ll.51f.us/?p=51

Would like to know what you think of the comic. At any rate, enjoy!

Cousin Vinny

=====
We welcome letters to the editor in response to this piece. Send to editor@clercscar.com. We reserve the right to edit letters for space and clarity or not to publish a letter.

We are always open to submissions. Submit your writing, artwork, or video to editor@clercscar.com.

To subscribe, email subscribe@clercscar.com with the message “Subscribe daily” or “Subscribe weekly.”

To unsubscribe, email subscribe@clercscar.com with the message “Unsubscribe me.”

Find us on Twitter and Facebook!

Visit our archives or bookstore at http://www.clercscar.com.

Copyright 2010 by Clerc Scar. All rights reserved.

  • Share/Bookmark

CS 24.8: 25 Cents: Part Three

Posted by – 4 February 2010

CLERC SCAR 24.8
4 February 2010

=====
25 CENTS: PART THREE
Aaron Weir Kelstone
Words: 955
[Play]

Cast of Characters

OLD MAN: A Deaf manual alphabet card peddler who never finished residential school. His signing style is what is called “strong ASL” or “very Deaf.”

BRIAN: A Deaf man, graduate of a residential school and a college graduate. His signing skills are what is often described as “Gallaudet signing.”

KELLY: A Deaf woman who was mainstreamed. She discovered Deaf culture later in life and sometimes is more radical than a native Deaf person about deafness. Her signing is not as ASL and she mouths often as she signs.

HARRY: A Deaf man, graduate of residential school, a skilled tradesman, and confident about his identify and values as a Deaf person. Sees the world clearly along black and white boundaries.

=====
Featured Ad:

Nancy Rourke – Expressionist Paintings
http://www.nancyrourke.com

=====
[Continued from last week. OLD MAN and BRIAN are sitting on a bench in a park. HARRY and KELLY are standing.]

OLD MAN: Shame? Because me use SSDI. Shame because me use English like foreigner. Shame because me sign ASL. Shame because me go to state school. Shame because me not think same as you. [To ALL.] Well, shame same for–[To HARRY.] You! Why? Because you always depend on parents, I know it! [To KELLY.] You! Because you voice like foreigner. I see the faces! [To BRIAN.] You! Because you not listen to Harry. He knows what is right. [To KELLY.] Shame because you mainstream. [To HARRY.] Shame because your mind is closed–full!

HARRY: B-S!

KELLY: Let’s go. We don’t need to do this. We are just wasting our time.

HARRY: What do you know? You’ll never understand. You’re just hard of hearing.

KELLY: Just. Just! You think that’s all it is, that my life is easy! Can you imagine what it is like to be alone? In class expected to use your voice with no choice and then and see the faces full of laughter? Or if they don’t laugh they smirk. And if they don’t then it’s the other way around. The minute they realize I’m not “normal” then it just happens like magic—[Snaps fingers.] Suddenly I’m an alien popping out to devour them. How many times do I have to see the shocked look on their faces or watch them retreat quickly down the hall. I didn’t ask for rejection then and this old man isn’t asking for it now.

HARRY: Fine! So you support him. Go, whore in the streets just like him. Be my guest. Go on. [Pushes KELLY away.]

[BRIAN steps between them.]

BRIAN: What do you think you are doing now? I don’t remember shoving women around as being a Deaf culture thing.

HARRY: As if you know anything about Deaf culture. The best thing you can hope for is that a hearing person might mistake you for a Deaf person.

BRIAN: You take that back.

[A shoving match starts. KELLY tries to intervene and it quickly gets out of hand. BRIAN, KELLY, and HARRY become a confusion of arms and legs and soon fall to the floor in a tangled mess. OLD MAN goes to pick up a discarded cup and heads to the birdbath to scoop up some water. Then he walks over to the others and throws water on them. All sputter in reaction to being doused with water.]

BRIAN AND KELLY: Hey!

HARRY: He’s lost his mind for sure.

OLD MAN: No, I celebrate.

KELLY: Celebrate what?

OLD MAN: I celebrate like hearing people if they could see you now.

BRIAN: What do you mean?

OLD MAN: DEAF POWER!

HARRY: Deaf Power?

OLD MAN: Yes, DEAF POWER! [Moves about the stage celebrating.] DEAF POWER! They be so happy to see. DEAF POWER! Deaf have the power to fight each other. DEAF POWER! Deaf people have then power to hate each other. DEAF POWER! Deaf people have the power to beat up on each other. [To HARRY.] Stab-in-back. [To KELLY.] Oh yes, stab-in-back. [To BRIAN.] Oh yes, DEAF POWER, DEAF POWER, DEAF POWER!

[HARRY finally has enough of this and starts to angrily chase down OLD MAN. He catches up with him and grabs him by the elbow.]

HARRY: Stop it! Shut up! You mock me. You mock all of us. You’re wrong to make fun of Deaf Power that way. It makes it a lie!

OLD MAN: No lie. I tell the truth.

HARRY: Lies!

OLD MAN: You see what you want. You not see me because I am a simple truth you fear. It never changes. None of you change. All my life I meet Deaf person they think I walk away because I ashamed? No, I walk away because their minds, and yours too, are already deaf. You are just scared of me because you know. If no 504, no ADA, no TTY, no interpreters, then you no different than me.

HARRY: In your dreams, old man. You’re right, Kelly–this is a waste of time. Let’s go.

OLD MAN: No, you listen! I have courage.

HARRY: Courage? You? As far as I’m concerned, you’re the biggest kind of coward. You don’t have the guts to get a REAL job.

OLD MAN: What I do takes more courage than you. Everyday I go out and look at the world face to face. I stand right here. Many not look me eye to eye. But, some, they look at me and they know. They same as me. I not need to say one word; not use one sign–they know. THEY KNOW! They owe me. You owe me! You’ll never understand that. You think this is easier? What little they give me will never replace what I lose.

HARRY: I will never accept you.

OLD MAN: Still true.

HARRY: Still lies! Nothing you can say will change that.

[To be continued next week.]

=====
Aaron Weir Kelstone teaches in the Department of Cultural and Creative Studies at the National Technical Institute for the Deaf.

=====
We welcome letters to the editor in response to this piece. Send to editor@clercscar.com. We reserve the right to edit letters for space and clarity or not to publish a letter.

We are always open to submissions. Submit your writing, artwork, or video to editor@clercscar.com.

To subscribe, email subscribe@clercscar.com with the message “Subscribe daily” or “Subscribe weekly.”

To unsubscribe, email subscribe@clercscar.com with the message “Unsubscribe me.”

Find us on Twitter and Facebook!

Visit our archives or bookstore at http://www.clercscar.com.

Copyright 2010 by Clerc Scar. All rights reserved.

  • Share/Bookmark

CS 24.7: Stoffel’s Guide to Workplace Newsletters

Posted by – 4 February 2010

CLERC SCAR 24.7
4 February 2010

=====
STOFFEL’S GUIDE TO WORKPLACE NEWSLETTERS
Scott Stoffel
Words: 364
[Humor]

Tired of those boring company newsletters they send at your workplace? Of course you are! Those newsletters can be so boring they make reading the labels on the back of dog food cans seem exciting. I had the honor of writing an office newsletter once and decided to add some pizzazz to the usual sleep-aid news they wanted me to write about. You can use my non-drowsy newsletter here as a template to improve the one at your own workplace.

Given the great job I did, I’m not sure why they never asked me to handle the newsletter again. Anyway, here’s . . .

NEWS FLUSH

CEO SPEAKS: “Woof!” Good CEO!

CAFETERIA INTRODUCES HOMESTYLE COOKING: Yep, they’re serving leftovers.

BUDGET TALKS UNDERWAY: It’s true! We’ve invented the world’s first talking budget.

JONES NAMED ACTING CHAIR: Imagine that–a chair that can act!

NEW FACES: As far as I know, no one around here got a facelift this month.

RETIRING: Sounds good to me!

BOARD MEETING HELD IN NEW YORK: Police have not disclosed what the charges are yet.

JOINT EFFORTS SPELL SUCCESS: I guess employees work better when they’re high on pot.

AIRCRAFT BOMBING ATTEMPT THWARTED: A stewardess prevented a man from dropping a lighted match into his drawers to set off a bomb disguised as a pair of Depends. The quick-witted stewardess snatched the matches away from the would-be bomber and declared, “I’m sorry, sir, but you cannot light a cigar on this flight.”

JOB VACANCIES: Check with your supervisor to see if you’ve been fired.

EXECUTIVES TAKE AIM AT THE FUTURE: They totally missed the present.

BUILDING EVACUATED: The evacuation was triggered when a group of employees returned from an all-you-can-eat chili buffet. De-fumigation efforts are in progress.

STRESS MANAGEMENT SEMINAR CANELLED: The presenter had a conniption shortly before the seminar and beat his PC to death after installing antivirus software.

SPRINKLER SYSTEM ACTIVATED: Well, the air conditioning went down, so . . .

READER FEEDBACK: I appreciate your comments on the newsletter. I’ve learned so many new four-letter words from you all.
If there is something you would like to have a Stoffel’s Guide for, send your ill-advised request to:

scottmstoffel@yahoo.com

=====
We welcome letters to the editor in response to this piece. Send to editor@clercscar.com. We reserve the right to edit letters for space and clarity or not to publish a letter.

We are always open to submissions. Submit your writing, artwork, or video to editor@clercscar.com.

To subscribe, email subscribe@clercscar.com with the message “Subscribe daily” or “Subscribe weekly.”

To unsubscribe, email subscribe@clercscar.com with the message “Unsubscribe me.”

Find us on Twitter and Facebook!

Visit our archives or bookstore at http://www.clercscar.com.

Copyright 2010 by Clerc Scar. All rights reserved.

  • Share/Bookmark

CS 24.6: Incompatible

Posted by – 3 February 2010

CLERC SCAR 24.6
3 February 2010

=====
INCOMPATIBLE
Nancy Rourke
[Artwork]

incompatible art

For those who are Braille readers, a text description is provided below.

The painting is divided vertically into two parts with different women. The women’s left and right sides make up a single split image. They are signing towards the viewer, teeth bared, and eyes looking at opposite sides. Harsh bright colors emphasize the signed word, “incompatible.”

=====
Featured Ad:

Deaf American Poetry showcases for the first time the best works of Deaf poets throughout the nation’s history–John R. Burnet, Laura C. Redden, George M. Teegarden, Agatha Tiegel Hanson, Loy E. Golladay, Robert F. Panara, Mervin D. Garretson, Clayton Valli, Willy Conley, Raymond Luczak, Christopher Jon Heuer, Pamela Wright-Meinhardt, and many others. Own your copy today at http://www.clercscar.com/books/dap.html!

=====
Nancy Rourke is a deaf artist, currently doing oil paintings on a series of Deaf-related Issues. She will have her artwork exhibited in a two-deaf-person art show in Denver on 18 March 2010.

=====
We welcome letters to the editor in response to this piece. Send to editor@clercscar.com. We reserve the right to edit letters for space and clarity or not to publish a letter.

We are always open to submissions. Submit your writing, artwork, or video to editor@clercscar.com.

To subscribe, email subscribe@clercscar.com with the message “Subscribe daily” or “Subscribe weekly.”

To unsubscribe, email subscribe@clercscar.com with the message “Unsubscribe me.”

Find us on Twitter and Facebook!

Visit our archives or bookstore at http://www.clercscar.com.

Copyright 2010 by Clerc Scar. All rights reserved.

  • Share/Bookmark

CS 24.5: No CI: A Hearing Perspective

Posted by – 3 February 2010

CLERC SCAR 24.5
3 February 2010

=====
NO CI: A HEARING PERSPECTIVE
Mark Drolsbaugh
Words: 1,163
[Essay]

One of the most frequent responses to the Evolution of a Cochlear Implant Attitude article is a question in the form of “But why wouldn’t you want to make the best of both worlds?”

In other words, why not utilize both ASL and a cochlear implant with a child who has the potential to benefit from each approach?

A reader–Alex, from Seattle–respectfully asked such a question. Alex said that even though she respects the deaf perspective, it would help if I could explain this in such a way that someone from a hearing perspective could understand it. A perfectly reasonable request. I’m sure many hearing people think deaf people are crazy when they turn down an opportunity to acquire more hearing. Alex’s question is a great opportunity to shed some more light on a subject that often stirs up a lot of heated debate.

Where to begin? Let’s find a parallel somewhere. Instead of talking about my deaf son Darren, let’s talk about my hearing daughter Lacey.

Lacey is an absolutely delightful 4-year-old girl. Charismatic personality and incredibly bright. She goes to the same deaf-friendly preschool program her older brother Brandon went to a few years ago. She actually signs a lot better than both of her brothers. On top of that, she follows her brothers around in the backyard and as a result has developed remarkable athletic ability. Never mind T-ball (which she won’t be old enough to play until next year), she’s already hitting pitched balls from her brothers. She’s got a rocket arm and will no doubt be a holy terror on the softball field in upcoming years. She also takes a gymnastics class on weekends and does fantastic.

Sounds like Lacey has a charmed life ahead of her, doesn’t she? The sky’s the limit, right? Hold on a second. Not so fast. There’s a significant obstacle standing in her way. After all . . .

Lacey’s a girl.

What? I’m not a male chauvinist. But I do know we live in a chauvinist world. It’s a fact of life, a cold piece of reality that needs to be dealt with. The world is just about teeming with male chauvinist pigs. Sooner or later, Lacey will have to face this. It’s inevitable. It could be in the form of sexual harassment. It could be in the form of discrimination.

In fact, many companies in the corporate world still have a glass ceiling as far as women are concerned. Even if women are moving up the corporate ladder here and there, discrimination still rears its ugly head.

It’s been said that women get paid about 75% of a man’s salary, even though they’re doing the same job. Think I’m exaggerating? Google women’s wages in the workforce.

Okay, enough of that rant. Let’s get back to the point. And that is, we know Lacey will face sexual harassment and discrimination throughout her life. All because she’s female.

So, based on that information, do you see my wife and I knocking on the doctor’s door to get her a sex change? Should we, based on the irrefutable evidence that she’s going to put up with a lot of crap as a woman?

Hell, no. Lacey’s a tough cookie. I feel sorry for her first boyfriend. Not because he’s going to have to answer to Darren, Brandon, and ultimately me. Rather, it’s because I’ve seen Lacey get pissed off and kick the crap out of her brothers when they tease her too much.

Seriously, I have faith in Lacey. I know she’ll deal with adversity. I know she’ll learn how to adapt to the world we live in, warts and all. She’ll develop resiliency. As a result she’ll develop more character, more strength, and more wisdom. She will succeed in this world on her own terms.

See where I’m going with this?

Exactly. Darren lives in a world where many people just don’t get it. It’s a world where a lot of people erroneously–sometimes arrogantly–assume he can’t possibly be happy if he can’t hear. Some people who acknowledge the existence of Deaf culture may have a less extreme view along the lines of Okay, fine, he’s happy–but maybe he’d be even happier with a hearing aid or cochlear implant.

The fact of the matter is, Darren knows all of the options out there. One of his friends has a cochlear implant, as do several of mine. Regardless of how well (or not well) those people are doing, Darren hasn’t seen anything that’s made him say “I gotta get me one of those!”

Instead, just like his sister, Darren is facing the world as who he is. He’s a deaf kid who doesn’t want a cochlear implant. I suspect one of the main reasons for this is he instinctively knows it’s not a prerequisite for success, as was pointed out in the Evolution of a Cochlear Implant Attitude article.

Darren has a comfort zone of Deaf culture in his home environment. His parents are deaf and both his siblings sign. (Note: I fully understand why a hearing family with a deaf child would be interested in the cochlear implant. There’s a communication bond within family members that is so important, it helps forms the core of your being. A communication barrier throws a monkey wrench into this critical aspect of development. Hearing families have the cochlear implant as an option to overcome this barrier. Yes, it can be argued that ASL does the same thing, but I’ll leave that for people to discuss in the comments section.)

Also, Darren’s comfort zone extends to close family friends. Darren sees so many deaf adults who are successful in all walks of life. He’s met deaf lawyers, performers, scientists, authors, computer technicians, teachers, entrepreneurs, and so on. Most of these people don’t have a cochlear implant. So Darren sees this and understands that it’s his grades in school, not the use of assistive devices, that lay the groundwork for future success (that, and the fact that his parents are really cool people who “get it.”)

As for my own attitude? I remain confident that he’ll be fine no matter what he does. I know there are cochlear implant success stories out there. At the same time I personally know people who have one, and their experiences greatly vary. I also work with many deaf children who aren’t getting much benefit from it, so I know it’s not a guaranteed, slam-dunk success. So if nothing’s broke, why fix it?

Once again, if this kid came up to me and said his life sucked and that he wanted to hear again, I’d look into it. But he doesn’t. He plays baseball with hearing kids, goes to deaf camps with deaf kids, and likes this balance just the way it is. He’s doing it his way, on his terms, with a strong core of deaf parents and a deaf community that will always have his back.

=====
Reprinted from Deaf Culture Online with the kind permission of the author.

Mark Drolsbaugh is the author of ANYTHING BUT SILENT and DEAF AGAIN, both of which are available for purchase at http://www.deaf-culture-online.com

=====
We welcome letters to the editor in response to this piece. Send to editor@clercscar.com. We reserve the right to edit letters for space and clarity or not to publish a letter.

We are always open to submissions. Submit your writing, artwork, or video to editor@clercscar.com.

To subscribe, email subscribe@clercscar.com with the message “Subscribe daily” or “Subscribe weekly.”

To unsubscribe, email subscribe@clercscar.com with the message “Unsubscribe me.”

Find us on Twitter and Facebook!

Visit our archives or bookstore at http://www.clercscar.com.

Copyright 2010 by Clerc Scar. All rights reserved.

  • Share/Bookmark

CS 24.4: Persistence of Hearing Expectations

Posted by – 2 February 2010

CLERC SCAR 24.4
2 February 2010

=====
PERSISTENCE OF HEARING EXPECTATIONS
Heather Lightfoot Withrow
[Artwork]

persistence of hearing expectations art

For those who are Braille readers, a text description is provided below.

Inspired by Salvador Dali’s “The Persistence of Memory,” melting elements in a bleak landscape are hearing aids, auditory trainers, and a cochlear implant. Gallaudet University’s Chapel Hall stands in the far background.

=====
Featured Ad:

Need to smile or laugh?
Check out deaf cartoons at http://www.mdaigletoons.com!

Need something to thank interpreters?
Order greeting cards at http://www.mdaigletoons.com/order.html!

Need a logo, illustration or graphic work for your business?
Check out artwork at http://www.mattdaigle.com!

All done by a deaf artist/cartoonist–Matt Daigle

=====
We welcome letters to the editor in response to this piece. Send to editor@clercscar.com. We reserve the right to edit letters for space and clarity or not to publish a letter.

We are always open to submissions. Submit your writing, artwork, or video to editor@clercscar.com.

To subscribe, email subscribe@clercscar.com with the message “Subscribe daily” or “Subscribe weekly.”

To unsubscribe, email subscribe@clercscar.com with the message “Unsubscribe me.”

Find us on Twitter and Facebook!

Visit our archives or bookstore at http://www.clercscar.com.

Copyright 2010 by Clerc Scar. All rights reserved.

  • Share/Bookmark

CS 24.3: 2012 Deaf Apocalypse?

Posted by – 2 February 2010

CLERC SCAR 24.3
2 February 2010

=====
2012 DEAF APOCALYPSE?
Mary J. Thornley
Words: 249
[Essay]

In an article titled “Global supply of rare earth could be wiped out by 2012,” China, as the author explained, is the world’s largest supplier of rare earth, and will cease exporting this product in 2012.

Rare earth is used in cars and cell phones and laptops. It is used in hybrid cars and in lithium batteries. It is also used in magnets, both internal and external, on cochlear implants. Rare earth is also used in the lithium batteries that power the units.

Rare earth is used to make powerful magnets. Two examples are neodymium magnets and samarium-cobalt magnets. These magnets are permanent: they never lose their force. Both are used in cochlear implants.

China, which formerly exported over 90% of the world’s rare earth, is currently reducing those exports. Western governments, alarmed at China’s move, have begun to seek other sources for rare earth. However, extracting rare earth is highly destructive, environmentally. China was willing to tolerate the pollution generated.

What will happen when there is not enough rare earth for cell phones and laptops, hybrid cars and military equipment? Will these devices become astronomically expensive? Would cochlear implant wearers find themselves targeted by thieves–a new twist to the word “head hunter”? Would implantation be stopped? Would it be difficult or expensive for users to get batteries?

Would those who had been implanted shortly after birth suddenly be unable to power their implants? What would happen to these persons, especially those who weren’t allowed to learn ASL?

=====
We welcome letters to the editor in response to this piece. Send to editor@clercscar.com. We reserve the right to edit letters for space and clarity or not to publish a letter.

We are always open to submissions. Submit your writing, artwork, or video to editor@clercscar.com.

To subscribe, email subscribe@clercscar.com with the message “Subscribe daily” or “Subscribe weekly.”

To unsubscribe, email subscribe@clercscar.com with the message “Unsubscribe me.”

Find us on Twitter and Facebook!

Visit our archives or bookstore at http://www.clercscar.com.

Copyright 2010 by Clerc Scar. All rights reserved.

  • Share/Bookmark